Thinking Nutrition

For the latest nutrition research and controversies

  • Home
  • About
  • Articles
    • Cancer
    • Diabetes
    • Gut Health
    • Mental Health
    • Women’s Health
    • Child Health
    • Heart Health
    • Eating Well
    • Managing Weight
    • Nutrition Supplements
    • Getting Active
    • Mythbusting
  • Podcast
  • In the Media
  • Services
  • Privacy
  • Contact
You are here: Home / Child Health / Commercial baby foods come up short

Commercial baby foods come up short

October 23, 2013 by Tim Crowe 1 Comment

baby foods
Baby Food Tasting by Lars Plougmann. CC BY-SA 2.0

A detailed survey of commercial baby foods has found that many do not measure up in meeting the dietary needs of an infant when weaning, compared to what breast milk or home-made foods can provide.

The introduction of solid foods is an important stage in the development milestones of an infant. Commercial infant foods are popular choices that busy parents turn to, but there is a question about how these foods compare to breastmilk or home-made foods.

A research team in the United Kingdom analysed the nutritional content of all baby foods available in the United Kingdom that can be used during weaning. A total of 462 ready made meals, powdered meals (that are reconstituted with milk or water), cereals and finger foods such as rusks were analysed. The range of foods surveyed is similar to what is available in Australia.

Almost two-thirds of the commercial baby foods surveyed were sweet based. This raises the concern that too much exposure to sweet foods in infancy can lead to children developing a higher preference for these foods. A high exposure to sugar at age 3 is linked with a greater risk of dental caries by age 6.

The energy content of the commercial foods was on a par with breast milk which may seem a positive finding. The reason though for introducing solid foods is to increase the energy content of a baby’s diet and provide more nutrients. Commercial baby foods did not adequately achieve this.

Another concern noted by the researchers was that 44% of the foods were marketed for use in infants from the age of 4 months. This recommendation goes starkly against current breastfeeding guidelines which advise breastfeeding to be the exclusive source of nutrition up to age 6 months.

The nutritional quality of the commercial foods was also compared against typical homemade foods. The comparison showed commercial foods generally had half the nutrients of typical home made foods per serve with the exception of iron content.

What it all means

When beginning infant weaning from the age of 6 months, exposing them to a wide-variety of home-prepared foods will be a superior option to the commercial foods available.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)

Filed Under: Child Health Tagged With: baby food, breastfeeding, infants, nutrition

Comments

  1. xvideos says

    November 10, 2019 at 7:17 am

    “If you’re really concerned about what your baby’s eating and don’t have the time to make your own baby food, focus your attention on what they’re eating once they begin table foods,” Shu tells WebMD. “It’s really a very short window of time when they are eating purees.”

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sign up for updates

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Recent Posts

  • How do the plant-based milks compare?
  • Magnesium: foods, functions and supplemental forms
  • Drink tea, stay healthy and carry on
  • Got iron? Foods, functions and insufficiencies
  • The science of soy: health, harms and hyperbole

Most Popular Posts

  • "Broccoli is bad for you, like, really toxic bad"
  • Steam, boil or fry? How cooking affects nutrient losses from foods
  • Eat vegetables to live longer
  • This is your brain on blueberries
  • 12 steps to writing a best-selling diet book
  • How using chopsticks can be good for your health

Get the Book

Understanding NutritionNow in its fourth edition, Understanding Nutrition is the leading text used in nutrition and dietetics courses in Australia and New Zealand. As one of the coauthors, I step you through core topics such as diet planning, macronutrients, vitamins and minerals and follow this with chapters on diet and health, sports nutrition, lifespan nutrition and food safety.

Work with me

If you have a project you would like to discuss be it website or newsletter content, blog or magazine articles, media copy or scientific writing (a career in medical research means I’m pretty handy in writing and reviewing papers and grants) then please get in touch with me.

Back to Top of Page ↑

Creative Commons Licence
Thinking Nutrition by Dr Tim Crowe is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Copyright © 2021 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in