Raw food eating is one of today’s hottest dietary trends. So does this mean you should pause and think twice before obliterating the nutrients in your food every time you cook it? Fear not – on the scales of health, there is little to be concerned about.
Cooking food is something we have done since the first caveman threw a mammoth steak on the fire. While it is true that cooking does cause chemical changes in food and a loss of some nutrients, it is a clear case of being alert and not alarmed.
Every time we cook food, there is some degree of nutrient loss. Exposing food to heat, oxygen or light alters the nutrients found in food. It is not all bad news though because cooking food also has its advantages. Cooking food can increase its digestibility, meaning you will get more nutrients out of it.
And even though there may be less of some nutrients from cooking, it is swings and roundabouts as the availability of certain phytonutrients increases. And of course, let’s not forget that heating food kills some of the nasty microbes that can cause food poisoning.
Eating in the raw
The principle behind a raw food diet is that cooking food destroys the natural enzymes and nutrients that would otherwise give us optimal health and control body weight. A raw food diet is almost entirely plant-based and includes fruits, vegetables, nuts, seeds, grains, vegetable oils and juices in their natural uncooked state.
Now on the pro side for a raw food diet, it means if you are currently eating a lot of processed food, then switching to raw food will be a clear nutritional win. So that gets a big tick.
Unquestionably, there are many benefits to eating plenty of fruits and vegetables. These foods are high in nutrients and fibre and low in kilojoules. But is raw superior to cooked? A review of 28 research studies found eaters of both cooked and raw vegetables had a lower risk of cancer compared to people who did not eat many vegetables in the first place.
Where the science gets murky is the claim that raw food is better because cooking destroys the enzymes found in plants. It is 100 percent correct that cooking will do this. But so too does digestion. Few enzymes survive their trip through the hydrochloric acid spa bath in the stomach. And those plant enzymes are essential only to the plants. The human digestive tract makes all the enzymes needed for digestion.
On the con side, choosing an exclusively raw-food diet can potentially put a person at a small disadvantage. When you exclude all cooked foods, you also exclude many healthy foods, and the nutrient diversity of your diet narrows.
Take the nutrient powerhouses of beans and lentils. When cooked, they are a cornerstone to super-healthy vegetarian, Japanese and Mediterranean diets. Legume-based diets have many health benefits including the prevention and management of obesity, heart disease and stroke, diabetes and metabolic syndrome.
Cooking can also destroy some of the anti-nutrients found in foods that bind minerals in the gut and interfere with absorption.
And the elephant in the room when it comes to cooking is not what it adds, but what it takes away. Cooking food at 75°C or hotter will kill most bacteria that cause food poisoning.
Nutrient losses quantified
So the big question: just how much of the nutrients in food do we lose when we cook it? Fortunately, the good people at The United States Department of Agriculture have compiled a detailed table of nutrient losses for 16 vitamins and eight minerals from 290 foods using a variety of cooking methods. For anyone overtly fixated on just what proportion of nutrients they are losing when they cook food, this is the best resource you will find.
A quick glance at the table will show you that most minerals are unaffected by cooking. It is really only vitamin C, folate and thiamin that stand out as being the main nutrients lost, but even then, levels rarely drop to half of their original value.
Losing vitamin C, thiamin and folate from cooking vegetables is easily offset by eating foods that are high in these nutrients and not normally cooked further. Citrus fruits are an excellent source of vitamin C. You will find lots of folate in leafy green vegetables, avocados and bread (which is fortified with folic acid). Vegemite is packed with thiamin and because of fortification, bread contains lots of it too.
Putting nutrient losses from cooking into context, just storing fruits and vegetables for several days means a gradual loss of vitamin C. Fresh will always be best, but frozen vegetables are certainly an option to consider as they are blanched and frozen very soon after picking, effectively “locking in” their nutrients for months.
A study that examined the nutrition delivered in eight common vegetables and 10 common fruits across fresh, frozen and canned packaging found frozen and canned produce to be just as cost-effective and nutritious as the raw fresh option.
The benefits of cooking
Food is much more than just the essential vitamins and minerals. There are hundreds of bioactive compounds found in plant foods that have favourable health benefits. These bioactive compounds can serve as antioxidant and anti-inflammatory agents and have anti-cancer and antibacterial roles as well.
Cooking losses of bioactive nutrients are considered small. In many cases, cooking actually increases the levels of some of these substances. That’s because heating food breaks down plant cell walls so they can release more of the nutrients.
A good example is from the many studies that have shown that levels of the beneficial antioxidant, lycopene (which gives foods like tomatoes their red colour) is much higher in cooked tomatoes than in uncooked tomatoes. The reason why is that the heat breaks down the plants’ thick cell walls, making more of the nutrients available to absorb. A study from The British Journal of Nutrition found that people who followed a raw food diet had normal levels of vitamin A and relatively high levels of beta-carotene, but lower levels of lycopene.
Then there was the report from Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry that found that boiling and steaming better preserves antioxidants in carrots, zucchini and broccoli compared to frying them. In all cases though, antioxidant levels increased because of the cooking method compared to the raw state of the food.
Though it is not all good news about cooking as some research shows that some vegetables such as broccoli could have better health benefits raw rather than cooked. In this case, heat damages the enzyme myrosinase, which breaks down glucosinates found in broccoli into a compound known as sulforaphane. Sulforaphone is an anti-cancer compound found in cruciferous vegetables such as broccoli. It appears to have general, but potent antioxidant and possible anti-inflammatory actions similar to curcumin.
What to do about the broccoli dilemma then: to cook or not to cook? The middle ground here is to lightly steam it so it’s cooked but still crunchy as this seems to minimise sulforaphane losses. With a crisp and tender texture and more flavour, you’re likely to eat more of it and that is what matters the most.
Getting the most out of food
So what are the best ways to you make sure you get the highest retention of nutrients during cooking? The three keys are water, temperature and time.
As temperature, cooking time, and water volume go up, so too do nutrient losses. If you can, try steaming rather than boiling as this helps to cut down on nutrient leaching. Or if you do boil, try and reuse the water in the dish. Soup’s up!
How do you ensure the highest retention of nutrients during cooking? The three keys are water, temperature and time.
Try also cooking at lower temperatures where possible, or use a higher temperature for a shorter time.
Keep the size of vegetable pieces as large as possible to reduce the surface area exposed to air which helps to minimise oxidation losses. And don’t overcook food: you want your broccoli firm and green, not wilted and white.
Tips to maximise nutrient retention during cooking
- If you need to boil food, use as little water as possible
- Add cooking juices from things like meat back to the food
- Don’t peel vegetables until after you cook them. Even better, eat them with the skins on to get more fibre and nutrients
- Cook vegetables until they are firm rather than soft if it suits your tastes as it means fewer nutrient losses from heat
- Cut food after, rather than before cooking, if possible. Cooking food whole means less of it is exposed to heat and water.
What it all means
Our biggest health problems in a country like Australia come from eating too much highly processed, nutrient-poor food. Worrying about losing some vitamin C every time you stir-fry or steam your vegetables fades into insignificance when you consider that most people are not eating enough of these foods in the first place. Less than 7 percent of us are eating the recommended number of servings of vegetables.
So the bottom line becomes to eat your fruits and veggies no matter how they are prepared. If cooking makes them tastier and more palatable then you are more likely to eat them. That is where the biggest health gains are to be had.
Adrian Barac says
Thanks for all your excellent work Tim! I’m always recommending your podcasts and articles to others.
I actually landed on this page by googling “sulforaphane thinking nutrition”.
I’m sure you’re aware of the research of people like Jed Fahey and Rhonda Patrick.
It’d be great to hear your views on the supposedly unique benefits of broccoli sprouts?
Tim Crowe says
Hey Adrian – thank you for your kind words and support of the podcast! Yes, very aware of the research around broccoli sprouts and the advocacy of them from people like Rhonda Patrick who I have a huge amount of respect for and follow their content.
My views on this is that ‘on paper’ the case looks great, but I could make the case for a whole range of phytonutrients coming from select foods ‘on paper’;. The problem is that we’ll never likely get definitive human research to show that one particular food will be far superior to a whole bunch of other fantastic plant foods So if someone is up for DIYing their own sprouts and enjoys them or is happy to source them then good luck to them and enjoy – just not something that I feel anyone should invest a lot of mental effort into and hang their hopes on one particular fruit or vegetable being a defining difference in their diet.
Enrique Pasion says
A very educational post on the effects of different cooking methods on food.
Many people think cooking keeps off the germs and bad substances, but yes, also the good stuff.
Reba Johnson says
broccoli tastes like rubber but its healthy so i dont choke it down
iris says
Healthy eating and running make a great combo. I started a healthier lifestyle at the beginning of this year and I’m also training for a race with SportMe half marathon app and things are going great for now.
Sinbi says
Hello sir Tim. I have one question that still haven’t been answered satisfyingly yet. There are these phytic and oxalic acids in raw foods especially in whole grains if am not mistaken that binds with some minerals and interfere with their absorption. I asked someone about it and these really would cause demineralization, and it’s really bad.
Sir, my question is if raw foods are cooked, about how many percent of these acids are destroyed..
And if we didn’t have the chance to cook and have consumed food with phytic and oxalic acids, is the demineralization that they would cause really bad. I mean what is the degree sir, would they really bind to let’s say, for example, 80 percent of the calcium available and make it unabsorbable?
Thank you so much sir..
Hajar says
Hello Sinbi,
About having legumes or nuts raw (which contain phytic acid), as far as I know, soaking for 7to24 hours or sprouting can help break the inhibitors and have more minerals available for absorption and digestion.
Hope it helps 🙂
Vince says
Great information. Raw food may have its place but it always feels like cooking makes ingredients more palatable and easier to combine. It’s good to know that we’re not killing the nutrition by doing so.
Susanna Morley says
Marvellous article, Tim. Of course it is all about off-setting and bioavailability.
The advice on how to cook vegetables is the same as that given to the British during WW2 by the Ministry of Food, now if only I could find the time to re-brand that and launch a lifestyle book …….
Bernard Milford says
Tim, I would like to hear your comments on microwaving food. There is some amazing rubbish out there about microwaves and the “violent” way they work to destroy molecules in food. But beyond that, the celebrity chef brigade seem to regard using a microwave as equivalent to blasting the poor veggies to a nuclear death ray that removes all flavour. Yet microwave cooking is energy efficient, quick and allows good control over the amount of cooking. Your suggestion for cooking a vegetable like broccoli “lightly steamed” is what a good old microwave does well.
I’d like to hear your sensible take on this.
Tim Crowe says
Hi Bernard. Thanks for your comments and very easy for me to confirm exactly what you see it as: rubbish. Microwaving food has little to no additional impact on food that steaming and heating on a stovetop does and scientific research confirms this. Microwave ovens are super convenient for the time efficiency of steaming food as you only need a tiny amount of water whereas on a stovetop you need a decent volume heated up to start the steaming process. The only kernel of truth to any of the claims you may read is to ensure the cooking is done in microwave-safe containers if plastic is used.
Vince says
Good to know. Many people are strongly anti-microwave – yet Bernard is right that they’re energy efficient. They’re also extremely practical, especially for small families and people who live on their own.