• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
nutrition health writer

Thinking Nutrition

For the latest nutrition research and controversies

  • Home
  • About
  • Podcast
  • Blog
    • Allergies
    • Cancer
    • Child Health
    • Collagen
    • Diabetes
    • Eating Well
    • Getting Active
    • Gut Health
    • Heart Health
    • Inflammation
    • Managing Weight
    • Mental Health
    • Mythbusting
    • Nutrition Supplements
    • Women?s Health
  • In the Media
  • Services
  • Contact
  • Search
You are here: Home / Allergies / Green light for nuts during pregnancy

Green light for nuts during pregnancy

September 6, 2012 by Tim Crowe 3 Comments

nuts during pregnancy
Nuts by Naomii. CC BY-ND 2.0

Avoiding peanuts during pregnancy is a common precaution that many expecting mothers take even though current public health recommendations show there is no need for this. New research just published in the Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology not only endorses the safety of eating nuts during pregnancy, but links peanut exposure to less allergies in kids.

Food allergies normally start in childhood with peanuts, cow’s milk, shellfish, wheat and eggs the most common food allergens (a substance which cause an allergic response). In utero exposure to nuts was thought to be a trigger for elevating allergy risk in children, but this idea has fallen out of favour due to the findings of recent research.

Recently, both the American Academy of Pediatrics and the UK Food Standards Agency have rescinded their advice that women should avoid eating nuts when pregnant if it was done to prevent possible future food allergies in their children. Nuts are also an okay food to consume during pregnancy according to Food Standards Australia and New Zealand.

Even with nuts during pregnancy given a green light from peak health bodies, there is still an understandable concern that many expectant mothers may still wish to avoid eating them.

To strengthen the safety profile of nuts, Danish researchers looked at the pregnancy diet and health outcomes of children born to 62,000 Danish mothers. The researchers had a good handle on the diet of the pregnant women as the food surveys included questions about nut consumption. They followed up the dietary surveys by tracking the health of the children at 18 months and 7 years after birth.

What the study found

The children of mothers who ate peanuts more than once per week during pregnancy surprisingly went on to develop less asthma (15% of children) at 18 months of age compared to children born to non-peanut eaters (17% of these children developed asthma). The difference was small, but grew larger to a 21% lower risk of developing asthma in children from mothers who ate peanuts when allowance was made for other risk factors that could explain the development of asthma.

Moving forward to 7 years of age, the difference in asthma rates were still stark with 34% less asthma seen in the children exposed to peanuts during pregnancy.

Looking at allergies as a whole, there were 20% less cases of those in children of mothers who were frequent peanut eaters. A similar trend of less allergic disease was also seen when consumption of tree nuts in general was looked at.

The study does have its limitations. Using an observational study design cannot prove that nuts lowered allergy risk. Other dietary factors linked to nut consumption such as a dietary pattern high in fruit, vegetables and legumes could be one explanation. Assessment of food consumption and reporting of allergy symptoms were both self-reported which introduces potential bias.

What it all means

The in utero environment is not a static one. Both maternal over and undernutrition during pregnancy are considered important factors in influencing later-life disease risk. The findings from this latest research make it appear unlikely that allergen exposure during pregnancy is a major driver of allergic disease risk in children. Recent changes to recommendations that pregnant women do not need to avoid nuts appear a sensible shift in policy.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit

Filed Under: Allergies, Women's Health Tagged With: food allergy, nuts, peanuts, pregnancy

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Sally Mitchell says

    March 29, 2014 at 8:25 pm

    I read this with interest, directed here from my Diet and Disease unit at Deakin. I intuitively took this path when pregnant with my children. My husband was/is part of a much smaller group of his generation with anaphylactic allergies to peanuts and eggs. He was also a severe childhood asthmatic, with the disease almost claiming his life a few times. Given the heredity nature of these conditions I was concerned with minimising the risk to our kids. When pregnant and breastfeeding I ate peanuts, eggs, and whatever else I felt like that wasn’t a listeria risk. I breastfed exclusively while eating these foods too, and then trialled them in my kids diet from the age of 12 months. It seems we beat the odds, with none of our three kids suffering from allergies, asthma or food intolerances and I like to think in part it was because I exposed them to a wide variety of foods and allergens early on.

    Reply
    • Sally Mitchell says

      March 29, 2014 at 8:31 pm

      Just another personal observational note, the higher rate of allergies amongst children of allergy sufferers would feed back onto itself if the information given here is correct. Most families with a parent with allergies would not keep the allergens in the house, and the children would never be exposed as a consequence.

      Reply
      • Tim Crowe says

        March 30, 2014 at 10:01 am

        Thanks for stopping by Sally. This also fits in with the very exciting research here showing small, measured doses of peanuts in children given over time can dramatically improve tolerance.

        Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Connect with Me

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Sign up for Updates

Loading

Most Popular Posts

  • Broccoli is bad for you, like, really toxic bad
  • Collagen supplements: a promising aid in tendon repair
  • Nutrition for healthy ageing: combating sarcopenia and inflammageing
  • Collagen supplements: the science behind the health benefits
  • Lemon water: is it worth the squeeze or just sour hype?

Get the book

Now in its fifth edition, Understanding Nutrition is the leading text used in nutrition and dietetics courses in Australia and New Zealand. As one of the coauthors, I step you through core topics such as diet planning, macronutrients, vitamins and minerals and follow this with chapters on diet and health, sports nutrition, lifespan nutrition and food safety.

Footer

Privacy policy

Terms of use

Creative Commons License
All content on Thinking Nutrition by Dr Tim Crowe is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License and can be reused with attribution.