Thinking Nutrition

For the latest nutrition research and controversies

  • Home
  • About
  • Articles
    • Cancer
    • Diabetes
    • Gut Health
    • Mental Health
    • Women’s Health
    • Child Health
    • Heart Health
    • Eating Well
    • Managing Weight
    • Nutrition Supplements
    • Getting Active
    • Mythbusting
  • Podcast
  • In the Media
  • Services
  • Privacy
  • Contact
You are here: Home / Managing Weight / Diet vs exercise: what’s more important for weight loss?

Diet vs exercise: what’s more important for weight loss?

August 23, 2012 by Tim Crowe 5 Comments

diet vs exercise
The Good and the Bad by Josh Kellogg. CC BY-NC-ND 2.0

Searching for the best way to lose weight? Should the emphasis be on diet, or can the solution be found in the gym? Well, the answer lies somewhere in between.

In the red corner of the weight-loss title fight, sits the dieting contender. On the surface, dieting would appear to have the edge, because no matter what a person’s genetic makeup and metabolism, anyone who stops eating is guaranteed to lose weight.

Starvation, though, is not a dieting option to be recommended or one that is sustainable. So should it be low-fat, low-carbohydrate, high-protein, low-GI, small meals or any one of a myriad other popular dieting approaches?

The scientific jury is now firmly in, with dozens of high-quality, randomised controlled trials showing that no one dieting option is the magic solution for everyone.

Apart from some short-term success for particular approaches – mostly low-carbohydrate diets – all of the popular dieting approaches fare poorly for weight loss and adherence once the six-month milestone has passed.

This was demonstrated in one of the largest and longest-run weight loss studies ever conducted, which investigated how diets with different fat, protein and carbohydrate content influenced weight loss.

Over 800 overweight adults took part in the study which ran for two years. Each person was randomly allocated to one of four different diets which ranged from high-carbohydrate/low-fat to low-carbohydrate/high-fat.

After six months, the average weight loss was 7% of the initial body weight, with negligible differences between the diets. Predictably, much of this lost weight was regained, with only half the people maintaining their new weight for two years.

As the study progressed, the differences in the nutrient mix between the diet groups became smaller, as fewer people met their diet goals for fat or carbohydrate intake.

If the participants of this research study found it difficult to stick to a diet, despite expert advice and ongoing follow-up and support, then the chances of success in the “real-world” are even more remote.

The rising rates of obesity in the face of continual best-selling “breakthrough” diet plans attest to that.

The significant number of clinical trials clearly and conclusively show that the fat, protein and carbohydrate composition of the diet matter little for achieving weight loss. Following a sensible eating plan and sticking to it matters most.

Bottle and measuring tape
Bottle and Measuring Tape by Chris Morin. CC BY-NC 2.0

So what about the contender in the blue corner: exercise?

Exercise has a modest, but consistent benefit on body fat reduction. And this benefit is independent of dieting. But the benefit of exercise in weight loss may not be as great as we may have expected. For people who are already overweight, even 60 minutes of physical activity each day may not be enough to halt weight gain.

One recent high-quality study, which looked at the ability of people to hold onto hard-fought weight loss. It found that 12 months after a weight-loss program ended, people who kept up more than 90 minutes of physical activity each day lost the most weight.

If you’re breaking out in a sweat just thinking about that much activity, don’t worry. What it really means is that more attention needs to be paid to the food side of the energy balance equation.

Here’s a simple example of the differences between eating and exercise. A 100g chocolate bar could easily be eaten in under one minute.

The amount of energy in that bar – 2200 kJ or 500 Calories – would be enough to fuel the body of a sedentary office worker for around five hours with no other food needed. Or you could try a 7km run or 90 minutes walk to burn off the energy from the chocolate bar.

So making some concerted changes to the “input” side of the energy balance equation can reap large benefits for weight loss.

The weight loss literature, though, is a minefield for diets that result in poor adherence and weight rebound. So instead let’s look at those who have been successful in losing weight and keeping it off.

Long-term successful “weight losers” make a conscious effort to adopt at least one weight-loss strategy from the list following:

  • ↑ fruit and vegetables
  • ↑ exercise
  • ↓ kilojoules
  • ↓ fat
  • ↓ sweets and junk food
  • ↓ portion sizes
  • ↓ overall quantity of food

It’s not surprising that all of these behaviour changes are consistent with current recommendations by nutrition and health professionals for safe and appropriate weight loss.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)

Filed Under: Managing Weight Tagged With: diet, exercise, physical activity, weight loss

Comments

  1. Baldvin Mikaelsson says

    March 14, 2018 at 12:03 am

    Nice post…
    Both the diet and exercise is important if you want to loose weight. I like the list with arrows.. it is easy to remind and understand.

    Reply
  2. kayla mark says

    April 3, 2017 at 11:21 am

    Hi Tim, just wondering if you update the information based on current literature updates and advancements as well as current recommendations.

    Reply
    • Tim Crowe says

      April 3, 2017 at 11:24 am

      Hi Kayla. If there has been a major shift in research I may revise a prior blog post, but normally it is a new blog post and topic that I would write.

      Reply
  3. Farham Erikson says

    January 4, 2013 at 2:36 pm

    Great post! Thanks!

    Reply
  4. Sabrina Chakman says

    August 23, 2012 at 3:30 pm

    This is such an interesting blog- and it looks great.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sign up for updates

Loading
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Recent Posts

  • The weird way that body posture changes taste
  • Collagen supplements: the science behind the health benefits
  • Is adrenal fatigue a thing?
  • Can keto cure cancer?
  • Hypothyroidism and Hashimoto’s disease: what role for diet?

Most Popular Posts

  • Hypothyroidism and Hashimoto’s disease: what role for diet?
  • Broccoli is bad for you, like, really toxic bad
  • Coffee and its surprising health benefits
  • Are collagen supplements legit or just Insta influencer fairy dust?
  • How do the plant-based milks compare?

Get the Book

Understanding NutritionNow in its fourth edition, Understanding Nutrition is the leading text used in nutrition and dietetics courses in Australia and New Zealand. As one of the coauthors, I step you through core topics such as diet planning, macronutrients, vitamins and minerals and follow this with chapters on diet and health, sports nutrition, lifespan nutrition and food safety.

Work with me

If you have a project you would like to discuss be it website or newsletter content, blog or magazine articles, media copy or scientific writing (a career in medical research means I’m pretty handy in writing and reviewing papers and grants) then please get in touch with me.

Back to Top of Page ↑

Creative Commons Licence
All content on Thinking Nutrition by Dr Tim Crowe is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License and can be reused with attribution